A 5 segundos truque para epicurismo



Stoic ethics is naturalistic, and thus very modern in nature, but it—to put it in rather anachronistic terms—does not simplistically erase Hume’s is/ought divide.

La filosofía pelo promete asegurar nada externo al hombre: en otro caso supondría admitir algo que se encuentra más allá de su verdadero objeto de estudio y materia.

Stoics commonly employ ‘The View from Above’, reflecting on society and otherness in a guided visualization, aiming to gain a "bigger picture", to see ourselves in context relevant to others, to see others in the context of the world, to see ourselves in the context of the world to help determine our role and the importance of happenings.

It’s not enough to simply hear these lessons once, instead, one practices them over and over again, turns them over in their mind, and most importantly, writes them down and feels them flowing through their fingers in doing so.

El nombre viene por los pórticos con columnas donde se reunían. Hoy la palabra coloquialmente significa "alguien de que se mantiene calmado bajo presión y evita extremos emocionales", pero el estoicismo era más qual una actitud. Los estoicos creían en una red causal de que resulta en una racionalidad universal qual llamaban Logos

In this sense, the Stoic account of knowledge was eminently empiricist in nature, and—especially after relentless Skeptical critiques—relied on something akin to what moderns call inference to the best explanation (Lipton 2003), as in their conclusion that our skin must have holes based on the observation that we sweat.

A famous metaphor here, used by Epictetus, is that of a dog leashed to a cart: the dog can either fight the cart’s movement at every inch, thus hurting himself and ending up miserable; or he can decide to gingerly go along with the ride and enjoy the panorama. This is a version of what Nietzsche eventually called amor fati

The modern day philosopher and writer Nassim Nicholas Taleb defines a Stoic as someone who, “transforms fear into prudence, pain into transformation, mistakes into initiation and desire into undertaking.”

. Dos mecanismos filosóficos qual tuvieron gran influencia en las cuestiones éticas de la sociedad y que se mantuvieron vigentes em mucho tiempo.

If clarity and distinctiveness are internal features of cataleptic impressions, then these are phenomenal features, and it is easy to come up with counterexamples where they do not seem to work (for instance, the common occurrence of mistaking one member of a pair of twins for referência usada the other one).

Eudaimonia was the term that meant a life worth living, often translated nowadays as “happiness” in the broad sense, or more appropriately, flourishing. For the Greco-Romans this often involved—but was not necessarily entirely defined by—excellence at moral virtues.

The article sums it pretty well your views that you put on the book as a summary of the reading list you have at the end of the book.

This concept of universal causality led the Stoics to accept divination as a branch of physics, not a superstition, as explained again by Cicero in Por Divinatione

The way matter is organized to form an individual object; in Stoic physics, a physical ingredient (pneuma: air or breath), which informs the matter

Para conhecer mais sobre Resumos de Livros

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *